Skip to main content

Caleb Ewan's Sprint Position - Revealed through Kinesiology

Are Your "Stiff" Wheels Actually Stiff? *Updated: New Video (No Flex)*

How many times have you heard or read a testimonial where someone said "these wheels are very stiff" without showing how stiff the wheels actually are?  It would be an understatement to say a lot, but I'm hoping to change this!

The equation above is the reason why I'm writing this post.  After reading the "Great Wheel Test - Part 3 - Stiffness" article at, I learned that during sprints at 1000 watts, you can expect to lose 150 watts on a flexible wheel.  So instead of 1000 watts, only 850 watts effectively gets used towards the acceleration.  That's a huge loss!

Since I don't have the equipment to measure lateral stiffness, I created a video to demonstrate a wheel's lateral stiffness under real conditions.  If the wheel isn't stiff, you'll either see the wheel deflect into the brake pads or go out of true... or both!
The Oval Concepts 524 rear wheel in the video below was the OEM wheel that came with my full carbon Kestrel Talon road bike.  Not only did the rim hit the brake pads despite having the calipers open and slightly rotated, it went significantly out of true!  Check it out:

Oval Concepts 524 Rear Wheel Lateral Stiffness Test

As you saw, the wheel initially maintained its shape, but immediately flexed into the brake pads as soon as the sprint started.  After a few more revolutions, the wheel lost its true.  Keep in mind that the spoke tension was within spec and confirmed with a Park Spoke Tensiometer.

The video was taken during a 20 second sprint from 14.5 mph to 27 mph.  Since I am a lightweight rider (137 pounds) sprinting on a relatively flat surface, I started at a cadence of 41 rpm to guarantee a high peak power output.  The max cadence I hit was 72 rpm.  I wish I could also provide you guys with some power data, but I unfortunately don't own a power meter.

Here's a screenshot from my Polar CS600X cycling computer showing the data from the sprint graphically.
The spreadsheet below was taken from my Polar CS600X.  The sprint started at the top of the list and ended on the highlighted row.
Here are some of the specs for this wheel:
  • 21 mm rim depth
  • 24 round spokes
  • 2-cross (drive side), radial (non-drive side)
After discovering how weak my Oval Concepts 524 rear wheel was, I needed to find a rear wheel that wouldn't flex.  The first wheel that came into mind was my 32 spoke rear wheel from my Fuji Roubaix 3.0!  With eight more spokes, it has to be stiff right?  Check out the video below to find out:

As you didn't see, the wheel barely made any sign of flex despite my hardest effort.  This video confirms two things.

  1. My frame DOESN'T flex or twist a discernable amount.
  2. The wheel is more likely to flex than the frame.  Makes sense especially since the wheels are supported by thin metal wire and the frame is a giant piece of carbon fiber.  Frame wins.

While there's a compromise of either weight or aerodynamics, wheel stiffness needs to be a high priority in any type of race or course where accelerations, sprints and climbs are to be expected.  Of course, there are tradeoffs, and if a super stiff wheel means doubling weight, then this would be detrimental to performance.
  7. RIM MATERIAL:  Not all carbon fiber rims are stiff.  Carbon fiber can vary in tensile strength (the amount of force to break the fibers) and tensile modulus (the stiffness of the fibers).  Velocite bikes wrote up a really good article discussing this topic.
As crazy as this sounds, throughout the entire 2012 racing season, I used my stock Oval Concepts 524 rear wheel in all of my races.  I remember losing the podium by a bike length and sometimes, by a few feet.  I trained harder, but my sprints barely improved because the extra strength only contributed to harder deflections and brake pad rub.  It's without question that a stiffer wheel could have changed the outcome of my results.

To be honest, when I bought my full carbon Kestrel Talon (Oval Concepts 524), I was very disappointed.  It always felt ridiculously slower to accelerate compared to my aluminum Fuji Roubaix 3.0 (Alex Rims DA13 rear wheel).  Despite having a stiffer frame, it now makes sense why my full carbon Kestrel felt slower than my aluminum Fuji in sprints.

While I don't recommend this to anyone, I started riding with my rear caliper open and it has done wonders to my sprints!  There's such a noticeable difference that I don't need data to tell me that my sprints are faster.

After watching my own footage, I've been really careful about how I shop for wheels.  I seem to pay more attention to things that I normally would not notice.  While subjective reviews are helpful in many aspects, going by feel doesn't seem to be the most reliable method to evaluating stiffness.  I hope this post helps everyone else out there make better decisions when buying a wheelset!


  1. thanks for sharing.

  2. Great test! Very interesting real world results! I REALLY hope my new wheels will not flex like this, 24 aero spokes in the rear, but they are on a deeper rim (27mm) which I hope keeps everything together when I throw down the watts in a sprint and hills!

    1. Depending on how it's laced and the hub used, it might not flex as bad as my Oval rear wheel. What wheelset are you getting? I'm looking for more 24 spoke wheels to test, so if you want, I can test your wheels next time I'm in the windy city. I just tested my friend's wheel and it was significantly better than my rear wheel. Same spoke count, but different lacing/ hub design.

  3. This blog site is pretty good! How was it made . I view something genuinely interesting about your site so I saved to my bookmarks . You can visit my site.
    Triathlon basics books


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kinesiological Approach To Bike Fit: Cleat Position

CLEAT POSITION:  There are four types of adjustments which can be made to a cleat.
Fore/ Aft:  FORE:  Positioning the cleat forward allows the ankle to move more freely, allowing for a smoother pedal stroke.  The trade-off is that this requires more ankle stability, calf strength and puts the rider at risk of developing quad dominance.AFT:  This position limits ankle motion.  This provides added stability to the ankle, allowing the calves to rest, but makes the rider prone to bouncy pedal strokes.  When switching from a forward cleat position to a rearward position, a lower saddle position is needed to compensate for decreased plantarflexion.Lateral/ Medial:  The goal is to spread weight evenly across the foot side-to-side.LATERAL:  Shifts weight towards the outside of the foot (small toe side).MEDIAL:  Shifts more weight onto the medial side of the foot (big toe side).  Limits the maximum amount of external rotation available before the heel strikes the crank arm.Rotation:EXTERNAL:  S…

How To Hold an Aero Position

There are climbs and then there are winds.  For many cyclists, riding into a strong wind can be more difficult than climbing, mostly because cyclists are required to reach a low aerodynamic position which can be uncomfortable, difficult or painful to hold.  Cyclists must demonstrate adequatehamstringandlower backflexibility to hold an aero position comfortably.  The flexibility needed to ride well in the wind can take time to develop, but with enough dedication and experience, anyone can become proficient at holding an aero position safely.  Here are some steps you can take to make holding an aero posture as comfortable as being on the hoods:

The worst thing a rider could do is force a low aero position and hope for the best.  With low back pain being one of the most frequent complaints among pros and recreational cyclist alike, the chances of long term pain- or injury-free riding are slim.  Develop the flexibility first, then shoot for the next lowest position yo…

Eagle Creek Park Cycling Grand Prix v2.0 - FIRST PLACE & FIRST PODIUM FINISH!

I can't even begin to describe how awesome it felt to have two dreams come true at once!  I always wondered what it would be like to be on the podium, but I never thought I had a chance at first place!

THE COURSE Below is a map of the course highlighted in blue.  It ran counterclockwise.  There were a few corners that stuck out to me.
Bottom right (corner #1):  This wasn't a very sharp corner, but the trees and brush made it difficult to see around it, so the group had a tendency to slow down and merge into a single line here.
Top right (corner #2):  This corner was very sharp, so oftentimes the group would merge into one or two pacelines, especially at higher speeds.
Top left (corner #3):  The inside half of this corner was covered by loose asphalt, so it wasn't an ideal or safe place to pass.  Pretty much everyone had to take a very awkward, wide line.  We could only fit about three abreast in this corner.
Bottom left (corner #4):  This was a very fast corner that led straigh…